The Influence of Medan State University Students Academic Fraud Behavior Through the Pentagon Fraud Dimensions

Authors

  • Dila Anjiani Universitas Negeri Medan
  • Lidia Lidia Universitas Negeri Medan
  • Restika Yenni Universitas Negeri Medan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54951/sintama.v3i2.558

Keywords:

Pentagon Fraud, Pressure, Academic Fraud

Abstract

The problem in this case is that we, researchers, are motivated to test the dimensions of the Fraud Pentagon, whether using it has a significant influence on the academic fraud of Medan State University students from various faculties. So that from the existence of various faculties, researchers will be able to analyze the comparison of academic fraud in various faculties using the dimensions of the fraud pentagon. This type of research is quantitative research, using a questionnaire as the research instrument. The population used in this research was from various faculties of Medan State University, the number of samples in this research was 32 students. It is hoped that this research can become research that is able to explore information related to pressure and behavior towards academic cheating. Furthermore, the results of this research are expected to reduce academic cheating behavior

References

Abdullahi, R., & Mansor, N. (2015). Fraud Triangle Theory and Fraud Diamond Theory. Understanding the Convergent and Divergent for Future Research. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, 5(4), 38–45.

Adeyemi, S. B., & Adelaja, S. O. (2011). Deterrent Measures and Cheating Behavior of Accounting Undergraduates in Tertiary Institutions in Lagos Nigeria. International Journal of Business and Management, 6(12), 195–204.

Albrecht, W.S. (2012). Fraud Examinaton (Fourth Edition). South-Western: Cengange Learning.

Amalia, RN, & Mahmud, A. (2017). The Influence of Fraud Diamond on Academic Fraud of Undergraduate Students, Accounting Majors, State Universities in the City of Semarang. Economic Education Analysis Journal, 3(1), 1–15.

Apriani, N., Sujana, E., & Sulindawati, IGE (2017). The Influence of Pressure, Opportunity, and Rationalization on Academic Cheating Behavior. EJournal Undergraduate Ak, 7(1).

Arena Lte. (2016). Similar to the film, this student cheats with sophisticated gadgets. https://arenalte.com/life/style/mirip-di-film-mahasiswa-inimenyontek-dengan-gadget-canggih/. (Accessed 20 March 2018).

Arikunto, S. (2014). Research Procedures: A Practical Approach. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Artani, KTB, & Wetra, IW (2017). The Influence of Academic Self Efficacy and Fraud Diamond on the Academic Fraud Behavior of Accounting Students in Bali. Journal of Accounting Research, 7(2), 123–132.

Becker, D., Janice Connolly, Paula U Lentz, & J Morrison. (2006). Using The Business Fraud Triangle to Predict Academic Dishonesty Among Business Students. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 10(1), 37–54.

Bintoro, W., Purwanto, E., & Noviyani, DI (2013). The Relationship between Self Regulated Learning and Student Academic Cheating. Educational Psychology Journal, 2(1), 57–64.

Boyle, D. M., Boyle, J. F., & Carpenter, B. W. (2016). Accounting Student Academic Dishonesty: What Accounting Faculty and Administrators Believe. The Accounting Educators' Journal, Special Ed(2016), 39–61. Boyle, D. M., Boyle, J. F., & Carpenter, B. W. (2016). Accounting Student Academic Dishonesty: What Accounting Faculty and Administrators Believe. The Accounting Educators' Journal, Special Ed(2016), 39–61.

Cizek, G. C. (2000). Cheating On Tests: How to Do It, Detect It, and Prevent It. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc. Publicher.

Second. (2013). Mass Cheating Scandal, 60 Harvard Students Suspended. https://news.detik.com/internasional/d-2159488/skandal-mencontek-massal60-mahasiswa-harvard-kena-skorsing. (Accessed 17 February 2018).

Dewi, KNA, Sulindawati, NLGE, & Sujana, E. (2017). The Influence of the Level of Academic Fraud Behavior on Accounting Students Majoring in Education and Non-Education at Ganesha University of Education with the Concept of "Fraud Triangle." Ak Undergraduate E-Journal, 1(2).

Eriskawati, E., & Januarti, I. (2016). The Influence of Relativism, Idealism, and Gender on the Student's Academic Cheating Behavior. Journal of Accounting Dynamics, 8(1), 78–83.

Feist, J., & Feist, G. J. (2008). Theories of Personality. Yogyakarta: Student Heritage.

Fitriana, A., & Baridwan, Z. (2012). Student Academic Deficiency Behavior: Dimensions of the Fraud Triangle. Journal of Multiparadigm Accounting, 3(2), 242–252.

Fuadi, M. (2016). Determinants of Academic Fraud in Students at the Faculty of Economics, Semarang State University using the Fraud Triangle Concept. Thesis. Semarang: Semarang State University.

Ghozali, I. (2016). Application of Multivariate Analysis with the IBM PSS 23 Program. Semarang: Diponegoro University.

Harsanda, A., & Setiyani, R. (2016). The Influence of Fraud Diamond Dimensions on Student Academic Fraud Behavior. Economic Education Analysis Journal, 3(1), 1–13.

Hartanto, D. (2012). Cheating Guidance & Counseling: Uncovering the Root of the Problem and the Solution. Jakarta: Index Publishers.

Herlyana, M., Sujana, E., & Prayudi, MA (2017). The Influence of Religiosity and Spirituality on Student Academic Cheating. Ak Undergraduate E-Journal, 8(2).

Horwath, C. (2011). What the Fraud Triangle is No Longer Enough.

Kusumantoro, Nurkhin, A., Mukhibad, H., & Kiswanto. (2016). Determinants of Fraud Based on Islamic Paradigm: Case Study in Islamic Financial Services Cooperatives. International Journal of the Computer, the Internet and Management, 24(3), 68–71.

Lano, P.F. (2015). Leadership Function to Reduce Employee Arrogance. Journal of Social and Political Sciences, 4(1), 74–81.

Lewellyn, P. G., & Rodriguez, L. C. (2015). Does Academic Dishonesty Relate to Fraud Theory? A Comparative Analysis. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 5(3), 1–6.

Malgwi, C. A., & Rakovski, C. (2008). Behavioral Implications of Evaluating Determinants of Academic Fraud Risk Factors. Journal of Forensic & Investigative Accounting, 1(2).

Malgwi, C. A., & Rakovski, C. C. (2009). Combating Academic Fraud: Are Students Reticent about Uncovering the Covert? J Acad Ethics, 207–221.

Martindas, R. (2010). Preventing Academic Fraud. http://budimatindas.blogspot.com/2010/08/cepat-kecurangananakademik.html. (Accessed 2 February 2018).

Mubtadin, TYL, & Yanto, H. (2016). Factors that Influence Academic Fraud Practices. Economic Education Analysis Journal, 3(1), 1–12.

Mufakkir, MEF, & Listiadi, A. (2016). The Influence of Factors in the Fraud Triangle Dimensions on Academic Fraud Behavior. Journal of Accounting Education

Muhsin, Kardoyo, Arief, S., Nurkhin, A., & Pramusinto, H. (2018). An Analysis of Student's Academic Fraud Behavior. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 164(March).

Murdiansyah, I., Sudarma, M., & Nurkholis. (2017). The Influence of Fraud Diamond Dimensions on Academic Fraud Behavior. Journal of Actual Accounting, 4(2), 121–133.

Nurkhin, A., & Fachrurrozie. (2018). Analysis of the Influence of Diamond Fraud Dimensions on the Academic Fraud Behavior of UNNES Accounting Education Students. Liabilities Journal of Accounting Education, 1(1), 1–12.

Nursani, R., & Irianto, G. (2014). Student Academic Fraud Behavior: Diamond Fraud Dimensions. FEB Student Scientific Journal, 2(2), 1–21.

Padmayanti, KD, Sujana, E., & Kurniawan, PS (2017). Influence Analysis Fraud Diamond Dimensions of Student Academic Fraud Behavior. Ak Undergraduate E-Journal, 8(2), 1–12.

Pamungkas, DD (2015). The Influence of Factors in the Fraud Triangle Dimension on the Academic Fraudulent Behavior of Class XI Accounting Students at SMK Negeri 1 Tempel in the 2014/2015 Academic Year. Thesis. Yogyakarta: Yogyakarta State University.

Pamungkas, ID (2014). The Influence of Religiosity and Rationalization in Preventing and Detecting Accounting Fraud Tendencies. Journal of Economics and Business, 15(2), 48–59.

Semarang State University Chancellor's Regulation Number 19 concerning Student Ethics and Rules.

Primasari, DN, Suhendro, & Masitoh, E. (2017). Accounting Students' Academic Fraud Behavior Using Fraud Diamond Dimensions. Journal of Accounting and Information Technology Systems, 13, 118–126.

Pudjiastuti, E. (2012). The Relationship between "Self Efficacy" and Cheating Behavior in Psychology Students. Pulpit, XXVIII(1), 103–112.

Purnamasari, D., & Irianto, G. (2014). Analysis of the Influence of the Fraud Triangle Dimensions on Students' Academic Fraudulent Behavior during Exams and Prevention Methods. FEB Student Scientific Journal, 2(2).

Rangkuti, AA (2011). Opportunity as a Threat to Academic Integrity. Journal of Education, 4(1), 31-36.

Ruankaew, T. (2016). Beyond the Fraud Diamond. International Journal of Business Management and Economic Research, 7(1), 474–476.

Sagoro, E.M. (2013). Synergy between Students, Lecturers and Institutions in Preventing Academic Fraud in Accounting Students. Indonesian Journal of Accounting Education, XI(2), 54–67.

Sari, DS, Rispantyo, & Kristianto, D. (2017). The Influence of Fraud Triangle Dimensions (Pressure, Opportunity and Rationalization) on Academic Fraud Behavior in Students. Journal of Accounting and Information Technology Systems, 13(4), 464–472.

Sudjana. (2005). Statistical Methods. Bandung: Tarsito.

Sugiyono. (2015). Educational Research Methods, Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches, and R&D. Bandung: Alphabeta.

Tessa, C., & Harto, P. (2016). Fraudulent Financial Reporting: Testing the Pentagon Fraud Theory in the Financial and Banking Sector. In Papers of the XIX National Accounting Symposium (pp. 1–21). Lampung: University of Lampung.

Tuanakotta, T.M. (2010). Forensic Accounting and Investigative Auditing. Jakarta: Salemba Empat Publishers.

Law Number 20 of 2003 concerning the National Education System.

Wahyudin, A. (2015). Research methods. Semarang: Unnes Press.

Widianingsih, LP (2013). Students Cheating Behaviors: The Influence of Fraud Triangle. Integrative Business & Economics Research, 2(2), 252–260.

Widianto, A., & Sari, YP (2017). Detection of Academic Fraud in D III Accounting Students at Harapan Bersama Tegal Polytechnic using the Fraud Triangle Model. AKSI Journal (Accounting and Information Systems), 1, 29–37.

Wisnumurti, PA, & Yulianto, A. (2017). The Influence of Fraud Diamond Dimensions and Academic Procrastination on Academic Fraud in Class X and Economic Education Analysis Journal, 1–15.

Wolfe, B.D.T., & Hermanson, D.R. (2004). The Fraud Diamond : Considering the Four Elements of Fraud. The CPA Journal, 2, 38–42.

Yudiana, AP, & Lastanti, HS (2016). Analysis of the Influence of Diamond Fraud Dimensions on the Academic Fraud Behavior of Economics Faculty Students. In National Seminar and Call Paper, Faculty of Economics, UNIBA Surakarta, 412–422.

Zaini, M., Carolina, A., & Setiawan, AR (2015). Analysis of the Influence of Fraud Diamond and Gone Theory on Academic Fraud. In XVIII National Accounting Symposium (Pp. 1–20). Medan: FEB University of North Sumatra.

Zimbelman, M.F., Albrecht, C.C., Albrecht, W.S., & Albrecht, CO (2014). Forensic Accounting (Fourth Edition). Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Downloads

Published

2023-05-31

How to Cite

Anjiani, D. ., Lidia, L., & Yenni, R. . (2023). The Influence of Medan State University Students Academic Fraud Behavior Through the Pentagon Fraud Dimensions. Jurnal Sistem Informasi, Akuntansi Dan Manajemen, 3(2), 173-185. https://doi.org/10.54951/sintama.v3i2.558