Analisis Pengukuran Kinerja Menggunakan Value For Money Pada Pemerintahan Kota Medan

Authors

  • Ad Dini Elhilal Ramadani Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara
  • Eka Nurmala Sari Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara
  • Rilla Gantino Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54951/sintama.v3i1.450

Keywords:

Value For Money, Performance Measurement

Abstract

This research was conducted because in the implementation of the preparation of regional revenue and expenditure budgets (APBD) there is often a waste of budget and inappropriate use targets that should be felt by the general public, and are still not optimal, especially there is no system for determining budget figures and LRA realization so that there is an upward and downward trend in the Medan City Government budget realization report in 2017-2021. The purpose of this study is to determine and measure The performance of the Medan City Government uses the concept of value for money , namely the economic ratio, the efficiency ratio and the effectiveness ratio, and to find out and analyze the causes of the economic ratio in the less economical category. To find out and analyze the causes of the efficiency ratio in the less efficient and moderately efficient categories. To find out and analyze the causes of the effectiveness ratio in the quite effective category.  The research method used is descriptive method with quantitative and qualitative data types. Data collection techniques in this study are documentation and interviews and are adjusted to Kepmdagri N0. 690.900-327 of 1996 concerning guidelines for the assessment of financial performance measurement. And data analysis techniques using quantitative descriptive analysis techniques.  The results of the value for money on the Medan City Government in 2017-2021 have an economic ratio which has an average of 77.73% in the less economical category, which has decreased because the target for the Medan City Government expenditure has not been achieved. In terms of the efficient ratio which has an average of 95.32% in the less efficient category. And in terms of the effectiveness ratio which has an average of 85.89% in the quite effective category, where both of these ratios have decreased due to the less than optimal regional income that has not reached the target set by the Regional Government.

References

A. Halim. (2007). Akuntansi Sektor Publik Akuntansi Keuangan Daerah. Jakarta: Selemba Empat.

Candra, V., Silaban, P. and Sudirman, A. (2019) ‘Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan Kepala Sekolah dan Budaya Sekolah terhadap Kinerja Guru’, Harmoni Sosial: Jurnal Pendidikan IPS, 6(1), pp. 49–60. doi: 10.33753/mandiri.v3i2.85.

Faud, M. R. (2016). Analisis Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah. Bogor: Gralia Indonesia.

FEB UMSU . (2021). Panduan Penulisan Skripsi Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis. Medan Umsu.

Halim. (2008). Auditing (dasar-dasar Audit Laporan Keuangan). Yogyakarta: Unit Penerbit dan percetakan STIM YKPN.

Halim, F. et al. (2020) ‘Constituents Driving Interest in Using E-Wallets in Generation Z’, in Proceeding on International Conference of Science Management Art Research Technology, pp. 101–116. doi: 10.31098/ic-smart.v1i1.32.

Indra Bastian. (2006). Indikator Pengukuran Kinerja Menggunakan Value for Money. Jakarta: Selemba Empat.

Keputusan Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor. 690.900-327 Tentang Pedoman Penilaian Kinerja keuangan.

Keputusan Menteri Dalam Negeri Republik Indonesia No 37 Tahun 2014 Tentang Pedoman Penyusunan Anggaran Pendapatan Belanja Daerah.

Mahmudi. (2014). Manajemen Kinerja Sektor Publik . Yogyakarta: UPP. STIM YKPN.

Mahmudi. (2015). Manajemen Kinerja Sektor Publik . Yogyakarta: UPP. STIM YKPN.

Mahsun, M. (2014). Pengukuran Kinerja Sektor Publik Edisi 1. Jakarta : Selemba Empat.

Mardiasmo. (2009). Akuntansi Sekto Publik. Yokyakarta: Andi Yogyakarta.

Maya Sari. (2021). Pengukuran Kinerja Keuangan Berbasis Good Corporate Governance . Medan: Umsu Press.

Nurmala, E., & Heny Triastuti K, Y. E. (2015). AKuntansi Sektor Publik Suatu Pengantar. Medan: Perdana Publishing.

Pandapotan Ritonga (2020). Akuntansi Internasional . Medan : Umsu Press.

Polii, I. R. A., Saerang, D. P. E., Tangkuman, S. J., Polii, I. R. A., Akuntansi, J., & Ekonomi, F. (2020). Analisis Pengukuran Kinerja Keuangan Pemerintah Provinsi Sulawesi Utara Berdasarkan Konsep Value For Money. Jurnal EMBA: Jurnal Riset Ekonomi, Manajemen, Bisnis Dan Akuntansi, 8(4), 781-788.

Risky P. Hutagalung (2021). Analisis Pengukuran Kinerja Mengggunakan Value For Money Pada Dinas Lingkungan Kota Medan. Skripsi. Medan UMSU.

Samuelson, W. D. (2013). Foundations of Economic Analysis . Jakarta: Erlangga.

Setiawan, A. B., Anwar, S., Zamaludin, A., & Annurul, D. S. (2021). Analisis Pengukuran Kinerja Menggunakan Value For Money Pada Satuan Kerja Balai Penelitian Tanaman Hias Kab. Cianjur Kabupaten Tabanan. E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana, 11.1 (2015) : 252-268.

Sudaryo. (2017). Keuangan di Era Otonomi Daerah. Yogyakarta: Andi Yogyakarta

Published

2023-01-30

How to Cite

Ramadani, A. D. E. ., Sari, E. N. ., & Gantino, R. . (2023). Analisis Pengukuran Kinerja Menggunakan Value For Money Pada Pemerintahan Kota Medan. Jurnal Sistem Informasi, Akuntansi Dan Manajemen, 3(1), 8-18. https://doi.org/10.54951/sintama.v3i1.450